<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you have any feedback on the AutoCompleteBox API?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/</link>
	<description>Silverlight, rich client apps and web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PIeter</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>PIeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Perhaps more a textbox feature, but AutoCompleteBox is also a textbox, is it not possible at this stage to add the text watermark feature as part of all the textboxes in SL3?  I had to develop my own versions when the original WaterMarkTextbox was removed - for both TextBox and AutoCompleteTextBox.

Apologies if I am too far off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps more a textbox feature, but AutoCompleteBox is also a textbox, is it not possible at this stage to add the text watermark feature as part of all the textboxes in SL3?  I had to develop my own versions when the original WaterMarkTextbox was removed &#8211; for both TextBox and AutoCompleteTextBox.</p>
<p>Apologies if I am too far off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>@Zack,
Your V-VM can typically work with web service calls, but more often than not, there is a gray area of sorts when doing a lot of these web service calls.

The need to call PopulateComplete after population could be done is the only real issue here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zack,<br />
Your V-VM can typically work with web service calls, but more often than not, there is a gray area of sorts when doing a lot of these web service calls.</p>
<p>The need to call PopulateComplete after population could be done is the only real issue here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Is MVVM supported for situations where the user makes web service calls to populate the autocompletebox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is MVVM supported for situations where the user makes web service calls to populate the autocompletebox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Zack,
It does support the MVVM pattern great! As with all controls, you&#039;ll find a tight coupling in your view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zack,<br />
It does support the MVVM pattern great! As with all controls, you&#8217;ll find a tight coupling in your view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>I wish that this supported the MVVM pattern</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that this supported the MVVM pattern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>it  looks like there might be a bug with valuememberbinding

after the vaue is set programmatically it is null

it still functions as expected ie the binding works but you can&#039;t get it&#039;s value

as for suggestions, i think it would be great if you included a sample that uses ria and also showed how to handle a foreign key in a grid.

there&#039;s a lot of noise out there on ways to do this but they are not especially clear and/or helpful.

if you know of a good example that would be terrific

thanks!
alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it  looks like there might be a bug with valuememberbinding</p>
<p>after the vaue is set programmatically it is null</p>
<p>it still functions as expected ie the binding works but you can&#8217;t get it&#8217;s value</p>
<p>as for suggestions, i think it would be great if you included a sample that uses ria and also showed how to handle a foreign key in a grid.</p>
<p>there&#8217;s a lot of noise out there on ways to do this but they are not especially clear and/or helpful.</p>
<p>if you know of a good example that would be terrific</p>
<p>thanks!<br />
alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orrin</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Orrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Eliminate the need to explicitly call PopulateComplete() when SearchMode is None. The need to call PopulateComplete() appears to break the separation between the View and ViewModel since the ViewModel needs to know what type of control is consuming the data and call the method on it after the data is updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliminate the need to explicitly call PopulateComplete() when SearchMode is None. The need to call PopulateComplete() appears to break the separation between the View and ViewModel since the ViewModel needs to know what type of control is consuming the data and call the method on it after the data is updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Via CodePlex issue tracker, http://silverlight.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2649 - provide IsReadOnly and IsEnabled properties.

I think IsEditable is a more WPF-compatible name, that we have considered.

IsEnabled is something that the framework provides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via CodePlex issue tracker, <a href="http://silverlight.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2649" rel="nofollow">http://silverlight.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2649</a> &#8211; provide IsReadOnly and IsEnabled properties.</p>
<p>I think IsEditable is a more WPF-compatible name, that we have considered.</p>
<p>IsEnabled is something that the framework provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/2009/04/autocompletebox-api-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeff.wilcox.name/?p=402#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Via Twitter, a suggestion was: &quot; is it possible to make the SelectionAdapter on the AutoCompleteBox a DependencyProperty so it is bindable?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via Twitter, a suggestion was: &#8221; is it possible to make the SelectionAdapter on the AutoCompleteBox a DependencyProperty so it is bindable?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
